IN CONVERSATION WITH Samkelo Mokhine (Executive Director for Freedon of Expression Institude)
Loading player...
The United States Department of State has revoked the visa of South African music executive Nota Baloyi following a social media post that appeared to condone the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The post, shared on X (formerly Twitter) in September, mocked American reactions to Kirk’s death, describing the incident as a “racist rally” that ended in “attempted martyrdom.”
In response, the State Department condemned such statements, emphasizing that the United States “has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans.” The department included a screenshot of Baloyi’s post, shared without revealing his identity.
Baloyi later confirmed receiving an email notifying him of the visa revocation. At the time, he said he was unaware of the reason but now considers the matter resolved. While he has removed the original post, he has since shared content identifying himself as its author.
He described the visa revocation as an unjust form of censorship and a violation of his right to free speech. Baloyi also pointed out that the post had received minimal engagement, noting only ten comments since it was published.
Although Baloyi may reapply for a U.S. visa in the future, the incident has ignited discussions on the limits of free expression and the responsibilities of public figures on social media platforms.
The post, shared on X (formerly Twitter) in September, mocked American reactions to Kirk’s death, describing the incident as a “racist rally” that ended in “attempted martyrdom.”
In response, the State Department condemned such statements, emphasizing that the United States “has no obligation to host foreigners who wish death on Americans.” The department included a screenshot of Baloyi’s post, shared without revealing his identity.
Baloyi later confirmed receiving an email notifying him of the visa revocation. At the time, he said he was unaware of the reason but now considers the matter resolved. While he has removed the original post, he has since shared content identifying himself as its author.
He described the visa revocation as an unjust form of censorship and a violation of his right to free speech. Baloyi also pointed out that the post had received minimal engagement, noting only ten comments since it was published.
Although Baloyi may reapply for a U.S. visa in the future, the incident has ignited discussions on the limits of free expression and the responsibilities of public figures on social media platforms.
